THESE people and representatives of a company have been in court for failing to provide information to police.

Emlyn William Thomas, 34, of Saron Road, Saron, Ammanford, was found guilty of failing to provide information by Llanelli Magistrates Court on March 7 but his case was heard before the court on April 4 for sentence.

He committed the offence on October 20 when he failed to provide Dyfed-Powys Police with information relating to the identity of the driver of a Seat Ibiza which was believed to have been involved in an earlier offence.

He was banned from driving for six months and ordered to pay £660 fine, £264 surcharge and £90 costs.

Adrian Alan Curtis, 54, of New Road, Trebanos, Pontardawe, was found guilty of failing to provide information by Cardiff Magistrates Court on March 2 and was sentenced by the court on March 31.

He committed the offence on November 22 when he failed to provide South Wales Police with information relating to the identity of the driver of a Mazda which was believed to have been involved in an earlier offence.

He was given six points on his licence and ordered to pay £660 fine, £264 surcharge and £90 costs.

Daniel Lee Davies, 36, of Heol Rhyd Ddu Fach, Cwmllynfell, was found guilty of failing to provide information by Cardiff Magistrates Court on April 6.

He committed the offence on December 28 when he failed to provide South Wales Police with information relating to the identity of the driver of a Citron C4 which was believed to have been involved in an earlier offence.

He was fined £660, given six points on his licence and ordered to pay £264 surcharge and £90 costs.

Representatives of NBA Developments Ltd, of Bethania House, Bethania Road, Upper Tumble, admitted failing to provide information at Llanelli Magistrates Court on April 5.

The company committed the offence on October 31 when failing to provide Dyfed-Powys Police with information relating to the identity of the driver of a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter which was alleged to have been guilty of an earlier offence.

The company was fined £660 and ordered to pay £264 surcharge and £110 costs.